I’m FragileSwan. And this is WordPress.

 

Why is gay marriage wrong? Why is it right? Marriage brings with it certain benefits. But why? Government supports marriage, because it depends on marriage for its continued existence. Without an environment for women to bear children within the context of security and commitment, there won’t be a populace for long. No people, no government.

 

The continued existence of The United States depends completely on Christian marriage and family. But why, Christian? Because the US Constitution was written under the assumption that the populace governed by it is Christian, and that Christianity be the prevailing religion.

 

The writers of the Constitution considered a particular religion to be any distinct denomination of Christianity. No other religion existed in the Western World. Jews were not originally permitted in the US, because of suspicions that they would undermine the economy in similar fashion to what necessitated the inquisitions in Europe.

 

Jews were allowed to work beside Roman Catholics, but the Jews were investing their wealth outside of Europe, thereby undermining the economies of European nations. The inquisitions served to present an irresistible threat to compel Jews to not only state their true religious alliance, but also to name other Jews who were working to collapse Western economies.

 

The people physically harmed during the inquisitions were those who lied. Anyone who was honest was set free to pursue a living in money lending. All other occupations were reserved for Catholics.

Consequently, the spirit of the Constitution does not recognize Islam, Buddhism, Taoism, Hinduism, Wicca, Satanism, Santeria (commonly and comically misspelled, Santa Ria), or Jedi as religions protected by US law. They could all be banned tomorrow, and it would be perfectly legal. But the government cannot ban Christianity, nor can it in any way use policy to in any way limit in any way Christian expression, regardless of who it offends.

I can prove it! All who oppose me will die! Everyone whose thoughts and/or beliefs conflict to my own, shall die! Everyone I don’t like shall die. If I mark a specific person for death, they will die. But how do I do that? I’m just a regular girl, mortal, without special powers except of perceiving the obvious: everyone shall die!

Therefore, any subset of all those alive shall also die. What if I say, “I hate blacks and they’re all going to die!” I don’t really hate anyone. I just wanted the readers attention. Those two items may both be true, but that in no way implies that one causes the other, or that they’re related at all.

I’ll give you an example. There was once a divorced man who communicated to his ex-wife: marriage is a biological function of the virgin; that the notion of a judges signature altering natural science was like a judge scribbling in green crayon on a wet cocktail napkin, I’m The Emperor of The Universe.

It’s like when a state legislature passes a bill that standardizes the answer to every story problem as, 2. That seems like a good idea to mathematically challenged judges and lawyers—who bitterly proclaimed and then went on to prove, “I’ll never use algebra in real life!”

Government lacks authority over mathematics and natural science. The blood and water from the pierced virgin prove she belongs to her bridegroom. We know this is true, because the Blood and Water released from the Sacred Heart of Jesus Christ, as He was pierced by the Roman soldier, prove that Jesus Belongs to Rome!

So, girls should not play rough sports, or they might end up from a biological perspective, belonging to a soccer ball. The most tragic form of maiming is for a girl to harm her most valuable asset: the choicest bridal adornment.

Anyway, the divorced man mentioned concern for the health of his children, and something about the necessity of regular vehicle maintenance.

The ex-wife had a history of waiting five years between oil changes. But the ex-wife had turned bitter-feminist, because she wasn’t getting pregnant on regular basis, and so her boiling cauldron of guilt for sensual pleasure had manifested itself as pathological denial of Truth.

So, in dread of the Truth, and in search of any possible means to justify her own sin, she took advantage of the fact that any woman is legally entitled to a domestic-abuse injunction against any male, anytime, anywhere, for any reason.

She claimed that she: feared for the health and safety of her loved ones, because of communication she had recently received from her ex-husband.

The compassionate concern that prompted the ex-husband to remind his ex-wife about the importance of regular vehicle maintenance caused the ex-wife to fear for the safety of her children. But, this fear was due to her ex-husband’s words, not her own irresponsibility. She secured a domestic-abuse injunction based on that claim.

In her mind, if the court calls something, harassment, it cannot at the same time be Truth. However, Truth is Truth regardless of court findings, because government possesses insufficient authority to alter Truth. Although a statement might not be a complete lie, it is fairly easy for reprobate females to grossly twist the Truth into a weapon.

In the case of gay marriage, government does not depend on gay couples. Gay couples marry out of pure selfishness, without regard for anyone but themselves.

The reproductive system is used to procreate the human species. Gays use it purely to sate their flesh, and they utterly disregard its life-giving purpose. In other words, no children will be conceived in a man’s rectum.

Gays live for sensual pleasure and bodily comforts available during temporal existence. They live for themselves, without regard for future generations. They benefit no one but themselves, and they care about no one but themselves.

Whereas Christian couples are healthier than their unmarried counterparts, gay couples voluntarily transmit disease, thereby placing a burden on the health-care system it cannot sustain.

Gay marriage decreases the value of the nation’s currency, weakens national defense, lowers productivity, causes economic decline, and removes all purpose for human existence! No civilization could survive such a thing.

Picture yourself in a foreign nation. There is another nation on either side of your nation. The nation on the right is filled with strong men, each of whom have an extensive selection of chaste, obedient virgins for prospective brides. They are devout Roman Catholics, all of whom regard their neighbors above themselves.

On the left is a nation known for the semen that drips out the backsides of all males 8 years and up. Rather than Holy Catholic Mass, that nation’s worship services consist of a woman having an abortion, while in the back pews gay males masturbate into turkey-basting syringes they in turn hand over to lesbians who then inseminate their wives with them.

The nation on the right uses gold coins as currency. The nation on the left uses aborted-baby blood as currency.

Now, which nation should you ally to and do trade with? Which nation’s people would you consider giving your life to protect? Historically, the greatest empires have fallen by moral decay. A sense of apathy develops. Love grows cold. Good people become willing to die, if only Almighty God would rain fire from Heaven on the wicked.

Homosexuality by its diabolical nature breeds contention simply because it is so repulsive and unnatural. The light of Christ radiating from Christians illuminates guilt and corruption in the hearts of homosexuals, prompting gays to seek vengeance by teaching sexual perversion to Christian children.

Gay marriage suggests that gay couples may raise children. Every boy wants to be like his father. And there is concern that homosexuals, by their temporal view of life, may use marriage as a means to secure child sex-partners by adoption.

Presently, this reality is being projected onto normal males. MSW programs across the nation proclaim that heterosexual males naturally molest their own children.

For this reason social workers have no reservations with regard to pressuring prospective divorcees into making groundless child-molestation accusations against their husbands. In the mind of a social worker, husbands are what stand between women and children, and happiness. But two male parents who regularly ejaculate into each others’ rectums is good for kids!

Gays are not entitled to the benefits of marriage, because society in no way depends on the existence of homosexual couples. They are a demoralizing drain on every righteous person. 1,700 people were asked, “If every homosexual died and no more of them would ever be born, would that bother you?”

The only participant that answered, yes, was also the participant that answered that he/she would prefer: a working television remote-control over immortality and absolute power.

It was the same person that described the pinnacle of human experience as, having a 12-pack all to myself; the same person who deemed pornography: the single greatest invention of all time; the same participant that attended the family reunion to: get chicks.

As it turned out, the participant was a consumer of graphic girl-on-girl media content. He reasoned: certain lesbians are fun to look at.

The desire for an end to the wickedness has one of two effects:

  1. People become willing to sacrifice their own lives just to escape the godless world.

  2. People deny that homosexual activity is serious sin, and consequently become guilty of the sins they permit.

If any of my readers don’t relate well to the concept of sin, they’ll understand it better when they’re immersed in the lake of boiling sulfur.

What was Truth is Truth now, and it always will be Truth. There is One Truth. Everything else is w-r-o-n-g! Don’t worry. No one is required to like it. Truth remains, forever!

Here is a cure for gay.

I’m FragileSwan. And this has been WordPress.