I’m FragileSwan. And this is WordPress.

 

We can probably sum up the cause of every problem in the world as simply: failure to practice Roman Catholic Doctrine as prescribed by Roman Catholic Doctrine.

 

But some girls might want a bit more detail. I’m also administering a test for gay. If you’re male and you came to this post to read it, you might just be gay.

 

I’m not positive, but I think this is the quick answer to the title: If a guy’s wife is either on birth control or she can no longer reproduce, the guy naturally seeks fertile virgins. Physical attraction is a genetically programmed reproductive trait designed for procreation of the human species. Guys don’t really get into relations with girls who produce no fruit from the man’s seed.

 

Males are attracted to females they want to get pregnant. If a girl wants to be, just friends, it means she wouldn’t even consider the guy’s reproductive material as a potential part of her offspring. When a male pursues a female, it’s because he wants to place his intimate gift of masculine love inside her fertile womb. This is beautiful in God’s sight.

 

A guy wouldn’t go out of his way on account of a female for any other reason. As proof I cite the degree to which a homosexual male will pursue one special female. A female is sexually attractive based on the time remaining in her season of fertility, the number of healthy offspring her body can carry during that time, her infant-feeding potential, the beauty of the children she will bear (her face), her state of virginity (girlish figure), and her fertility (long, thick hair; hard, strong nails).

 

But in the case of pictures of professional nude models, these women represent the male conception of perfection in female reproductive and infant-feeding potential. I think the real issue is honesty. If guys are honest, their wives can be secure. It’s when guys sneak around and act guilty if their wives find out that makes wives insecure.

 

It isn’t the other girls. It’s that, for the girl, trust is essential to love. If the wife asks, “So what are you planning on doing tonight?”

 

The guy can just say, “I’m going to view digital images of female models on the Internet. I’m masculine. You should only be concerned if I want to look at guys online. You want me to be happy, right?”

 

As long as the girl has a sense that she matters enough for the guy to trust her, manifest by his honesty even if it means resistance initially, the whole picture makes sense. Everyone searches for Truth. Now she knows it’s not because of her that the guy goes online. It’s because she’s either on birth control or past menopause.

 

All other things being equal—that is, no fruit of the womb will be produced from the man’s seed either way—males prefer even pretend interaction with the more attractive females. It’s a little hard to believe that a guy could get turned on by a girl pictured alone in suggestive whatever, because no girl would ever look like that by herself.

 

Isn’t it obvious she’s getting paid to do a job, and she has no idea, nor could she care less who’s looking at her? But some guy thinks the model has been waiting in the photo vignette, forever, just for him, because he’s such a man. “Oh, yeah, baby, I’m just waiting for that one special drunken porno hound to pierce my hymen and release my blood sacrifice of innocence, so I can conceive offspring from your seed.”

 

I don’t think so! Girls are allowed to make comments on a guy’s choices in recreational activities! So, burst his little bubble, and tell him you, unlike the models on the Internet, you are actually aware of his existence, and you love him more than anything! I think guys turn to cyberspace models because they feel rejected. If a girl is on birth control, she’s telling the guy that she doesn’t want more of his genetic code in the world. That’s pretty severe! Even if she doesn’t say it, he might feel that way.

 

Ok, the long version:

 

The virgin suffers her share in the Pain of Atonement of God The Son, and the man experiences his share in the Pleasure of Creation of God The Father. The virgin releases her blood sacrifice of innocence to atone for sin held as genetic mutation in the man’s reproductive chromosomes.

 

Humans are mammals. The theory of evolution teaches that mammals mate in solitary pairs of one male and one female of like species, and only when the female is fertile, in a single marital act after which the female conceives offspring.

 

If the human female is mated only when fertile (when conception occurs), she will never learn pleasure forbidden to the female. Therefore, though the virgin conceives by the man, as long as she does conceive, she commits no sin, because she knows only suffering.

 

Atheist doctrine mistakenly classifies perversion among animals in captivity as, natural. The sound conclusion is exactly what we expect, sexual perversion among mammals in captivity crosses species boundaries!

 

Biology teaches us that marriage is a biological function of the human female. The water released from the virgin, as her bridegroom pierces her bridal adornment, consecrates her marriage bed for creation of new blessed life in her holy and chaste womb.

 

The blood from the virgin seals the blood covenant of marriage between Almighty God, Who gave the virgin her sacred release and sealed it safely within her; The virgin’s bridegroom, who assumes the position of conquest over the supine, surrendered virgin, and sends his invading army—an army by which the virgin shall conceive—into her unexplored intimate territory; And the virgin, whose blood sacrifice of innocence atones for sin held as genetic mutation in the man’s reproductive chromosomes!

 

Biological science is fascinating! According to the physical law of marriage, the blood and water released by the virgin, as she is pierced by her bridegroom, is the temporal reflection of which the Blood and Water released from the Heart of Jesus Christ, as He was pierced by the Roman soldier, are the Eternal Reality!

 

The universal law of atonement states in part: blood and water released from pierced innocence proves belonging. The rational conclusion is then: the virgin belongs to her bridegroom, and Jesus belongs to Rome.

 

A court finding for divorce against an unwilling male holds equivalent legitimacy to a note scribbled on a paper towel, in green crayon, “Five equals three!”

 

Likewise, all judicial fiat in conflict to natural science, severing a marital bond without the man’s permission being common in this category, is to be treated with the kindness, understanding and forbearance granted by scientists and engineers to the Indiana state legislature when they passed a bill to legally define the value geometric constant, pi, in conflict to its actual value.

 

Would the attempt have been successful, all vestiges of industrialized civilization would have vanished. The whole of scientific discovery would have been made meaningless banter, and no one would know whether they would remain a human being or turn into a tennis ball before dusk. Pi is a rational fraction indivisible to a finite number of decimal places. Government lacks authority to alter its value.

 

The virgin releases her sacred issue for exactly one male. The male naturally mates only with females he can call his own. I didn’t really know about this until I read it in my biology textbook. The author uses imagery. First he does the part for females.

 

“Girls, Picture yourself on your wedding night. You bridegroom has gone into you, and you’re suffering the virgin’s share in the Pain of Atonement of God The Son. You have allowed the most intimate part of a man inside yourself.

 

By genetic programming unique to the female, your chaste sacrifice has triggered your whole being: reproductive anatomy, psychology, spirituality, and biochemistry to conform perfectly to this very special male, making you dependent on his endowment for happiness and well-being. You’re now his perfect mate, made just for him. He can call you, his own, because you belong to him.

 

Now, picture yourself again, but this time your bridal adornment is not available; you have no sacrifice to offer. According to the biological law of marriage, your bond to your bridegroom is by social custom and verbal commitment only. He cannot call you his own if someone else, or something else, release from you the virgin’s atonement sacrifice.

 

He will not be able to love you the way he could have. He will give you the same respect you show to your own body. All his life he will still be seeking the chaste virgin who wasn’t there on his wedding night. This is manifest by certain natural, exclusive male behaviors.

 

So that the human species can survive, males are genetically programmed to locate fertile virgin females; females whose girlish figures belie the first fruits of the womb have not previously been sown or reaped. To protect the species from death by microbial illness, males are programmed to drive off other males who might otherwise attempt to mate the man’s females.

 

If females are protected, each will mate one male. Combine that to males mating only virgin females, and you’ve got the formula to stop sexually transmitted disease. Such ailments are spread by behavior that is opposed to biological science and human genetic programming. All successful mammalian species naturally protect their females against having more than one living mate.

 

Once the female is mated, nature’s expectation is that she has conceived, so she has no further legitimate use for the man’s intimate gift of masculine love. Until the female bears and nurses the man’s offspring, regenerates her hymen, and becomes fertile again, the male will not naturally perform the marital act on her.

 

Pregnant females are not sexually attractive to males, but that’s natural. The woman can’t get more pregnant than she is already is, but the male can get a new virgin pregnant each day. Evolution produced the, out of sight, out of mind, trait in males. It’s very well-known to females, which hastens the question, ‘What part of it don’t we understand?’

 

It allows the male to focus on the fertile female. It only makes rational sense in the reproductive context that the man not be distracted by females outside visual proximity.

 

Physical attraction, courtship and marriage are genetically programmed reproductive traits designed by God Almighty for procreation of the human species. Accompanying passions are the anticipation to realize the procreative function, which for the woman is to bear and nurse the man’s offspring, preferably man-child.

 

The man’s procreative function is to place his intimate gift—a gift he made himself in response to his love for the woman—inside her fertile uterus. The male does not release a blood sacrifice of innocence, so he does not owe to the woman exclusive access to himself. The virgin does release a blood sacrifice of innocence, so she owes to the man exclusive access to herself.

 

After he has performed his procreative function with the virgin, it’s perfectly natural for the male to seek other virgins. If he does not do this, it’s a sign he died! The historical record provides medical evidence to confirm this.

 

King David, king of Judah, exhibited absence of behavior. His attendants called for several soldiers to quickly seek out and bring to the them the most beautiful and shapely sixteen-year-old female that they could find. When they returned with the girl, the kings eunuchs bathed her, applied fragrance and cosmetics, did her hair and laid her next to the king.

 

Absence of behavior persisted, and the king was pronounced dead. Upon official announcement, Davids son, Solomon, inherited the kings harem of over five-hundred of the most desirable women as his wives and concubines! That’s all there is to it. Science isn’t so scary after all!”

 

Doesn’t that just make you sick!

 

I’m FragileSwan. And this has been WordPress.